The New York Giants made an enormous mistake.
Selecting Daniel Jones over Saquon Barkley was questionable on the time, and time has solely made it all of the extra evident.
Jones’ profession 12 months was a considerably common season for many quarterbacks.
He wasn’t a highly-rated quarterback popping out of highschool, was a walk-on at Duke, and wasn’t a coveted prospect once they took him within the first spherical of the NFL Draft.
However despite the fact that consistently committing to him has solely confirmed to be a mistake, the gamers nonetheless have his again.
In keeping with a report by Jordan Schultz, Giants gamers are offended that, as unhealthy as Jones has been, the choice to bench him was principally motivated by cash.
Sources: There’s “disappointment” amongst some #Giants gamers relating to how the Daniel Jones scenario was dealt with over the previous week, particularly with gamers conscious it was primarily a monetary choice by the group.
Dexter Lawrence publicly acknowledged on Tuesday: “He’s the… pic.twitter.com/BCZwrwYc5B
Dexter Lawrence even publicly stated he provides them one of the best probability to compete.
Honestly, that is likely to be the case, however that doesn’t imply he’s an NFL-caliber beginning quarterback.
Wins aren’t a quarterback stat, however there’s no option to justify conserving him on the market after his 3-13 document since signing that contract extension.
Jones has a $23 million damage assure if he can’t move a bodily initially of subsequent season, so the Giants want to make sure that’s not the case.
That’s why, given his subpar performances and unending struggles, it made sense to bench him.
NEXT:
Report: Insider Says 1 NFL Coach Is ‘Teaching For His Job’
